Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors

Ultimate Guide to Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors

 

 

Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors

 

Permanent Magnet Motors (PMMs) are widely used in industrial automation, EVs, and appliances due to their high efficiency, power density, and low maintenance. Among PMMs, Brushless DC (BLDC) and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM) dominate—yet their torque characteristics differ significantly in structure, control, and performance.

 

1. Structure & Operating Principles

 

Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors


BLDC Motors


Design: Trapezoidal back-EMF with concentrated stator windings.

Control: Electronic commutation (Hall sensors/sensorless) switches stator currents in six-step sequences, creating a rotating magnetic field.

Goal: Speed/position control with square-wave currents.

 

Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors

 

PMSM Motors


Design: Sinusoidal back-EMF with distributed windings.

Control: Advanced algorithms like SVPWM or FOC generate smooth rotating fields via precise current vector control.

Goal: High-precision torque/speed/position control with sinusoidal currents.

 

2. Torque Equations & Performance Comparison


Torque Generation

Motor Type

Torque Equation

Key Components

BLDC

T = K_t × I_a

K_t: Torque constant (depends on flux/windings).       I_a: Stator current.

PMSM

T = (3/2) × p × [λ_PM×i_q + (L_d - L_q)×i_d×i_q]      

λ_PM: PM flux.       i_d/i_q: d/q-axis currents.        L_d/L_q: Inductances.


PMSM Torque Notes:

 

Surface-mounted (SPMSM): L_d ≈ L_q → Torque mainly from PM flux (i_q).

Interior (IPMSM): L_d ≠ L_q → Additional reluctance torque optimizes output.

 

Torque Characteristics

Parameter

BLDC

PMSM

Torque Ripple

High (due to square-wave commutation)

Low (sinusoidal currents + FOC)

Control Precision

Moderate (speed-loop dependent)

High (direct torque/current control)

Peak Torque

Limited

Higher (field-weakening + reluctance torque)

Overload Capacity

Moderate

High (advanced current limiting)

Efficiency

High (~85–90%)

Very High (~90–95%, lower harmonics)

 


3. Control Strategies & Complexity

 

Aspect

BLDC

PMSM

Control Method

Six-step commutation, Hall sensors

FOC, DTC, field-weakening

Implementation

Simple (low-cost microcontrollers)

Complex (DSP/FPGA required)

Cost

Low

High

Speed Range

Narrow

Wide (field-weakening enabled)


Key Takeaways:

BLDC: Easy to implement, cost-effective, but trades off torque smoothness.

PMSM: Superior performance with FOC/DTC, demanding higher computational power.

 

4. Application Recommendations

 

Torque Comparison: BLDC vs. PMSM Motors


Choose BLDC When:
Cost sensitivity > torque precision (e.g., fans, small water pumps, basic power tools).

Simple control suffices (e.g., fixed-speed drives).

High starting torque is needed (but ripple is tolerable).

 

Choose PMSM When:
Precision matters (robotics, servo systems, EV traction).

Efficiency and low torque ripple are critical (aerospace, medical devices).

Wide speed range is required (spindles, industrial automation).

 

5. Conclusion


BLDC: "Workhorse" for budget-friendly, moderate-performance apps.

PMSM: "High-performer" for precision-critical, high-efficiency systems.

Pro Tip:

For retrofits, BLDC’s simplicity often wins.

For new designs, PMSM’s advanced control pays off in performance.

Match the motor to your needs, and torque won’t be a bottleneck!

  • wechat

    PJM Service: motoractuator

Chat with Us